CASE DETAILS

<< Back to Cases in CA

Los Angeles City College District

Lopez v. Kelly Candaele, et al.


Summary

Jonathan Lopez is a student at Los Angeles City College, a college in the Los Angeles Community College District. During the fall 2008 semester, College officials censored Mr. Lopez’s public expression and then retaliated against him for reporting the censorship. When delivering a speech in a public speaking class pursuant to an open-ended assignment, Mr. Lopez discussed his Christian faith and read the dictionary definition of marriage as being between a man and woman. Upon hearing this, Professor John Matteson silenced Mr. Lopez in the middle of his speech. Professor Matteson refused to allow Mr. Lopez to finish his assignment, publicly accused him of being a “fascist bastard,” and refused to give him a grade for the assignment, telling him instead to “ask God” for his grade. Mr. Lopez reported these actions to Dean Allison Jones, who took no public action to correct the censorship. When Professor Matteson saw Mr. Lopez reporting the incident to Jones, he told Mr. Lopez that he would find a way to get him expelled. When Mr. Lopez complained again to Dean Jones and College President Jamillah Moore, they took no action to protect his constitutional rights and instead accused him of engaging in hateful propaganda. Dean Jones and President Moore made these allegations based on the District’s vague and overbroad speech code. This speech code is enforced, in part, through a system of reporting that encourages students to file complaints about their fellow students whenever those students utter words or engage in actions deemed subjectively “offensive” or “harassing.” Attorneys with the ADF Center for Academic Freedom filed suit on Mr. Lopez’s behalf in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on February 11, 2009.


Decision

On July 10, 2009, the district court entered a preliminary injunction against the District’s unconstitutional speech code.  The court held that the speech code was overly broad and allowed administrators to punish speech that is protected by the First Amendment. The college appealed to the United State Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which ruled that Jonathan Lopez did not have standing to challenge the speech code. On March 16, 2011, ADF submitted a a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Implications of Decision

The First Amendment protects Christian students’ right to equality of opportunity on campus.  Students should be able to express their views during appropriate classroom activities without fear of retaliation.  In addition, university speech codes stifle the “marketplace of ideas” and unconstitutionally limit student speech on campus.  These speech codes should be repealed and brought into conformity with the First Amendment.

Case Documents


Jonathan Lopez v. Kelly Candaele, et al._Complaint.pdf

2010.09.17 LvC Opinion.pdf

LopezEvaluationSheet.pdf

LvC Petition for Writ of Certiorari.pdf



Related Media


VIDEO- Religious Freedom at Risk on Tax-funded College Campuses

Christian College Student Sues Over Speech Prof's Treatment of His Presentation

“Ask God what your grade is”

Los Angeles City College Is Sued Over Alleged Bias Against Christian Student

Prof calls Christian student 'fascist b------'

Student Sues L.A. College Over Right to Give Anti-Gay Marriage Speech

Christian College Student Sues California College for Violation of Free Speech Rights

Free Speech 101

LA Times- Lawsuit over gay-marriage speech at L.A. City College spurs reactions

Free speech clashes on campus

Student sues professor over 'fascist bastard' comment


Tell a Friend

Know someone who would like to know more about their religious rights on campus?

Tell a Friend how they can Speak Up

on Social Networks

© 2012 Alliance Defending Freedom. All Rights Reserved.

ADF
Contact Us | RSS Feed